Message in a Bottle: Q1 2025
A quarterly newsletter on Plastics, Logistics, and Flame Retardants
Contents
đȘTrade War Escalations & The Impact to Americans
đȘAntimony, Antimony, Antimony
đȘRecycling News – Plastics Recycling Breakthroughs
Trade War Escalations & The Impact to Americans
On his 13th day in office, February 1, 2025, President Donald J. Trump, through an executive order aimed at curbing illegal drug trafficking, declared 25% tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico, and a 10% additional tariff on goods imported from China. [1]

This does not quite reach the 60% he alluded to on the campaign trail, as we discussed in our last newsletter https://oceanchemie.com/message-in-a-bottle-q4-2024/ . With room to grow, President Trump is willing to increase these tariffs further as he sees fit. For a taste of how quickly things may change, just 2 days after the announcement of the tariffs, on Feb. 3 the tariffs on Canada and Mexico were postponed for 1 month after the neighbors gave promises to increase security at their borders with the US.[2] This pause on the tariffs did not include the tariffs on China, those 10% additional tariffs are in effect.
On February 27, on a post on Truth Social, Trump announced his intent for the tariffs on Canada and Mexico to resume, and for an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods to go into effect on March 4. [3] Important and critical imports from China now are encumbered by a cumulative tariff of 45%.
In the short-run this adds pressure to manufacturers in the US, who now have their costs increased from goods imported from China, the second largest country of import to the US at 14.5% in 2023. [4] And the costs of goods imported from Canada and Mexico, which make up 13.6% and 15.2% of US Imports respectively, will add additional pressure for US manufacturers and consumers, and President Trump has confirmed that the 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico will come into effect in March 2025. [5]

The plastics industry in the US is estimated to comprise $519 billion, and in 2023 exports for the industry totaled $74.2 billion, exceeding total imports of $73.3 billion, a $958 million surplus. And tariffs threaten this surplus. The Plastics Industry Association (PLASTICS), the trade association for the plastics industry in America since 1937, issued a statement expressing concern about an escalating trade war. The deleterious effects on the plastics manufacturing industry in the US via new tariffs will threaten supply chains, increase costs, and erode the trade surplus of American plastics manufacturing. [6]
And this is just the direct effect on the plastics industry, and adjacent or complimentary industries will be similarly affected, causing a negative feedback loop threatening the industry, and the entire US economy.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), estimates that the trade war between 2018 and 2021 caused the US to lose real income of 0.17% of GDP, or roughly $40.3 billion. [7] While this number may seem relatively small compared with the GDP of $23.68 trillion in 2021, it puts pressure on industries and companies, already under pressure from inflation.
The idea that tariffs are a tax on the country of export, the country outside the US, is round-about logic. The tariffs are paid by US individuals and companies who import the goods from abroad, and the increased cost is theoretically so great that it is no longer economically viable to buy from said country, causing the imports to cease and therefore reduce the trade and income of the foreign nation. However, these nations will develop trade elsewhere in the world, and cut out the US from opportunities.
One predominant argument put forward by Peter Navarro, Trump’s appointment to senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, is that tariffs do not increase costs to consumers, because foreign companies will just reduce their prices to stay competitive. While this sounds logical it has not been our experience. For every new tariff, we’ve seen companies similarly increase their costs to match the new tariff price.
Even still, domestically many companies will buy goods originating from China that have been transshipped, and have an intermediary port used as the country of origin, thus subverting the tariff and its intended effects entirely. We explored this topic in a previous newsletter here: https://oceanchemie.com/message-in-a-bottle-may-2024/ . And just recently, in the appropriately titled article âA guide to dodging Trumpâs tariffsâ, the Economist explores how Converse and other firms are tweaking their products slightly to entirely avoid the tariffs, all legal.[7]
We agree that President Trumpâs need to curb the illegal drug trafficking is desirable, unfortunately the effect of a blanket tariff on legal imports will do little to achieve this. Instead, these measures will negatively impact manufacturers and consumers in the US, whom President Trump represents.
[2] – https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87d5rlee52o
[3] – https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/27/us/politics/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-china.html
[4] – https://oec.world/en/profile/country/usa?yearlyTradeFlowSelector=flow1&depthSelector1=HS2Depth
[5] – https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/24/trump-says-tariffs-on-canada-and-mexico-will-go-forward.html
[7] – https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29315/w29315.pdf
[8] – https://www.economist.com/business/2025/02/24/a-guide-to-dodging-trumps-tariffs
Antimony, Antimony, Antimony
Antimony export to the US from China is halted as discussed in our previous newsletters Q3 and Q4 of 2024. For a time China halted export to Mexico and Canada as they were deemed too close to the US, this is how restrictive China is being. Recently they started exporting Antimony once again to other countries, including Mexico and Canada. Companies outside the US that wish to purchase antimony from China must submit detailed company information forms to the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) of China. Those forms can be found here. We have seen companies with subsidiaries or parents in the US have their applications denied.
Companies have been scrambling to source ATO, now at exorbitant prices. Many are sourcing through Thailand and India.
Producers and refiners of ATO outside of China are scarce. US Antimony (NYSE:UAMY) has a production capacity of 6,800 MT of ATO per year, and recently acquired the rights to another mine in Alaska, making 3 mines acquired in the last year.[1][2] They are small, they are backed up, and quite frankly focusing on the wrong part of the problem.

They need to expand their production capacity to keep up with the demand, the sources of the raw antimony will come, they need refiners, not miners.
For some perspective, while US Antimony Corp. is the only refiner in the US, there are multiple 20,000 MT/year refiners in China. The US is behind.
Elsewhere in the world, in Oman, the most recent and advanced ATO refinery in the world, SPMP, with a production capacity of 20,000 MT/year, suspended operation at the end of 2023.[3] What tragic timing! The stakeholders are looking for $80million to restart operations, in part to pay off old debts.

In a recent article, Xinyu Ru the founder and portfolio manager of Fawkes Capital Management estimates that antimony price could reach $100,000 per ton.[4] Make sure to read this article if you are interested in a detailed breakdown.
Ocean Chemical will continue to keep you informed about the state of Antimony and ATO. Please feel free to reach out to us for comments and questions.
[1] – https://www.usantimony.com/
[3] – https://www.spmp.co.om/
Recycling News – Plastics Recycling Breakthroughs
You know of the garbage patch floating in the ocean. The Great North Pacific Garbage patch is estimated to be 620,000 square miles or 1.6 million square kilometers or, for some real perspective, 6 times the size of the state of Colorado or 3 times the size of the country of France. [1]
The debris is not all trashbags and flipflops. Most of the debris is polyurethane, and it is not so dense that a human could walk across this depressing island. Instead, most of the plastic is fine microplastics, widely dispersed and not visible on satellite nor from the deck of a boat. [2] And while this sounds all at once like a huge problem and also a micro one, the microplastics and the effects of biomagnification adds to the growing concern of the growing amount of microplastics found in our brains and our balls. [3]

Stopping all plastic production and use is a long way off if at all desirable, and plastic alternatives may come with their own problems. A recent study analyzing the necessary crops and trees and their land-use to replace plastics will result in 22% expansion of land mass used for crops of corn and others, and disturbingly a 20% increase in world-wide deforestation. [4] Where can we look to for a solution?
Three more direct solutions will need to come together. For one, The Ocean Cleanup, a non-profit, is already underway cleaning up the ocean debris and river sources since 2013. Their efforts have removed over 21 million kilograms of plastic as of 2025, with the goal of 90% of the plastic in the ocean and rivers to be cleaned up by 2040.[1]

Secondly, a fascinating recent study out of the University of Hawaii (UH) in MÄnoa, led by Ronja Steinbach, have demonstrated that marine fungus can be conditioned to degrade polyurethane (OU) plastic at increasing rates.[5] The researchers in effect trained the fungus to degrade PU more quickly than untrained fungus. This shows great promise in the fight against plastic pollution. They caution, however, that these methods are not the âsilver bulletâ.

The previous two efforts are tackling the symptoms of a world overrun by plastic waste. Our efforts as individuals and communities will make a difference, when we reduce, reuse, and recycle (I know you know, we all know, and while sick of hearing it, it is true). Recycling is real, and the Polystyrene Recycling Alliance (PSRA) is a coalition that represents the entire value chain of polystyrene, its partners include AmSty, INEOS, and Lyondellbasell.[6] About 30% of landfill space is filled with polystyrene.[7] As we discussed in our Q3 2024 newsletter https://oceanchemie.com/message-in-a-bottle-q3-2024/ the US recycling rate is 32.1% and the EU is 48.6%. There is hope for steady progress, and small actions each day make the difference. You know what you need to do.
[1] – https://theoceancleanup.com/
[2] – Philp, Richard B. (2013). Ecosystems and Human Health: Toxicology and Environmental Hazards (3rd ed.). CRC Press. p. 116. ISBN 978-1466567214.
[3] – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03453-1
[4] – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01492-7
[5] – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00275514.2024.2422598
[6] – https://psrecycling.org/
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/welcome.html
Written by Kent Scholler